Showing posts with label US. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US. Show all posts

Monday, 21 December 2020

Highly Toxic Algal Blooms on the US West Coast Triggered by Ocean Heatwave - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

Highly Toxic Algal Blooms on the US West Coast Triggered by Ocean Heatwave.

Fishermen, swimmers, and seafood enthusiasts may already know the dangers of “red tides,” but a recent study in Frontiers in Climate shows that climate change is increasing the frequency of one type of highly toxic algal bloom off the US west coast.

These algae produce a neurotoxin — called domoic acid — that causes severe and potentially lethal digestive and neurological symptoms. This threat to marine wildlife and humans is restricting shellfish harvest in the region, but local bulletins are helping to forecast the blooms.

“This study shows that climate change can influence the occurrence and intensity of some harmful algal blooms (HABs) by creating new seed beds for their survival and distribution,” says lead author Dr. Vera L Trainer, of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in Seattle, Washington. “Coastal communities, including Native Tribes, will suffer from the effects of HABs more frequently in the future, illustrating the importance of early warning systems such as Harmful Algal Bloom Bulletins that are becoming operational in the US and other parts of the world.”

ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-Toxic-Algal-enthusiasts

Starting in 1998, Trainer and her colleagues began monitoring domoic acid — which is produced by Pseudo-nitzschia algae — in shellfish samples and ocean water along the US west coast. In 2015, the severe heatwave in the northeast Pacific Ocean triggered a new record-breaking Pseudo-nitzschia bloom that closed shellfish harvest and caused widespread marine mammal mortalities. As a result, a region in northern California near the Oregon border has become a new toxic hotspot that has prevented shellfish harvest every year since that heatwave event.

A related finding used multi-model datasets to show that the 2013-2015 heatwave was five times more likely to have been caused by human, rather than natural, influences. Models also predict that extreme marine heatwaves are now 20 times more likely to occur than they would be without climate change. These models include several decade’s worth of data, including temperature, wind, and ocean current measurements, which allow researchers to make a wide variety of climate predictions and risk assessments.

Due to the water currents and coastal topography, the region near the California/Oregon border provides favorable conditions for recurring algal blooms in the future — called retentive regions. At this site, and other retentive regions along the US west coast, Pseudo-nitzschia can remain dormant in sediments for years until ocean upwelling brings the algal cells to the surface and temperatures become warm enough for the algae to multiply.

In response to these now frequent blooms, a regional partnership between NOAA, the University of Washington, the Washington State Departments of Health and Fish and Wildlife and Native Tribes with support from the Northwest Association for Networked Observing Systems has created the Pacific Northwest Harmful Algal Bloom Bulletin to forecast these events and warn local communities of when and where it is safe to collect shellfish. Trainer’s team found that these Bulletins have become a cost-effective tool to help minimize the health and economic toll of the algal blooms.

“There is evidence that bacteria associated with seagrasses have algicidal properties, indicating that seagrass planting may be used to successfully control some HABs in Puget Sound,” says Trainer. “But for large-scale marine HABs, early warning is our best defense and these HAB Bulletins will help preserve a way of life that includes wild shellfish harvest, on which coastal people depend.”


The above Artice can also be read using the link below:

Highly Toxic Algal Blooms on the US West Coast Triggered by Ocean Heatwave.

Wednesday, 16 December 2020

US imposes sanctions on Turkey over Russia weapons - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

US imposes sanctions on Turkey over Russia weapons.

The US has issued sanctions against its fellow Nato ally Turkey over its deployment of a Russian-made missile defence system acquired last year.

The US says Russia's S-400 surface-to-air missile system is incompatible with Nato technology and a threat to the Euro-Atlantic alliance.

The sanctions announced by the state department on Monday target Turkey's weapons procurement sector.

The move was swiftly condemned by officials in Turkey and Russia.

The US had already kicked Turkey out of its F-35 fighter jet programme over the purchase of the Russian-made missile system.

What is the US objecting to?

"The United States made clear to Turkey at the highest levels and on numerous occasions that its purchase of the S-400 system would endanger the security of US military technology and personnel and provide substantial funds to Russia's defense sector, as well as Russian access to the Turkish armed forces and defense industry," US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a statement.

"Turkey nevertheless decided to move ahead with the procurement and testing of the S-400, despite the availability of alternative, Nato-interoperable systems to meet its defense requirements," he continued.

"I urge Turkey to resolve the S-400 problem immediately in co-ordination with the United States," he said. "Turkey is a valued ally and an important regional security partner for the United States, and we seek to continue our decades-long history of productive defense-sector co-operation by removing the obstacle of Turkey's S-400 possession as soon as possible."

The sanctions target Turkey's Defence Industries Directorate president Ismail Demir, and three other employees.

They include a ban on US export licences, as well a freeze on any assets that are in US jurisdictions.

What does Turkey say?

Turkey's foreign ministry urged the US "to reconsider this unfair decision as announced today", adding that Turkey "stands ready to address this issue through dialogue and diplomacy in conformity with the spirit of alliance".

The ministry warned that US sanctions "will inevitably negatively impact our relations, and (Turkey) will retaliate in a manner and time it sees appropriate".

Ankara argues that the Russian system was purchased after the US refused to sell US-made Patriot missiles. Turkish officials point to the fact that Greece - another Nato ally - has their own S-300, although that was not purchased directly from Russia.

Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov also condemned the US decision as "another manifestation of an arrogant attitude towards international law.

"A manifestation of illegitimate, unilateral coercive measures that the United States has been using for many years, already decades, left and right," Mr Lavrov continued.

How important is Turkey?

Turkey has the second-largest army in Nato, a 30-member military alliance.

It is one of the US's key allies, and is located in a strategic position, sharing borders with Syria, Iraq and Iran.

It has also played an important role in the Syria conflict, providing arms and military support to some rebel groups.

However, it has seen relations deteriorate with some Nato members and the EU, who have accused Mr Erdogan of adopting an increasingly authoritarian style following a failed coup in 2016.

How does the S-400 work?

ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-sanctions-Turkey-Russia

1. Long-range surveillance radar tracks objects and relays information to command vehicle, which assesses potential targets

2. Target is identified and command vehicle orders missile launch

3. Launch data are sent to the best placed launch vehicle and it releases surface-to-air missiles

4. Engagement radar helps guide missiles towards target (Source: bbcnews)


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

US imposes sanctions on Turkey over Russia weapons.

Tuesday, 17 March 2020

India-US Defence Deal 2020: Security Implications for Pakistan - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

India-US Defence Deal 2020: Security Implications for Pakistan.

During recent Trump’s visit to India, both the countries signed US 3 billion dollars defence deal involving various sophisticated weapons. The deal consists of the sale of six Boeing AH-64E Apache Guardian attack helicopters for the Indian Army and 24 Sikorsky MH-60R Sea Hawk multi-role helicopters for the Indian Navy.

ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-India-US-Defence-Deal-Pakistan
Pakistan has already shown concerns that this deal would result in further destabilizing the already volatile region.
Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry’s Spokeswoman Aisha Farooqui stated that “the sale of such sophisticated weapons to India will disturb the strategic balance in South Asia with security implications for Pakistan and the region.” She also stated that the region could not afford an arms race or conflict and urged the international community to prevent the destabilization of the region.
Since 2007 India’s defence cooperation with the US has reached US 17 billion dollars as it aims to modernize its military to achieve its ultimate goal of becoming the global power. With the recent purchase of the sophisticated weapons, India is increasing its sphere of influence in the region which is quite alarming for its neighboring countries specifically Pakistan. The defence agreement between them clearly marks close collaboration in military, conventional and non-conventional weapons which may pose serious repercussion on geo-strategic scenarios of South Asia.
US being the major power is supporting India to play a larger role of the regional policeman and fulfill its long term hegemonic designs to dominate the smaller states with the help of its military strength. Hence this defence cooperation has accelerated India’s dream of becoming the global power.
Moreover India’s obsession of buying the most sophisticated weapons is a serious concern for Pakistan as it is likely to create conventional asymmetry in the region. The recent deal consist of weapons which Pakistan doesn’t have right now, hence it will disturb the conventional balance between the two states. Maritime security cooperation between India and the US is nothing but an attempt to secure the maritime domain which can cause serious maritime conflict between India and Pakistan in the Indian Ocean and international seas as well.
The Apache attack helicopters are equipped with the hellfire missiles, night vision capabilities, 70 mm rockets and an automatic gun, which makes it the most lethal machine in the world. The Apache would add greater firepower and agility to the Indian ground forces for any quick and intense operations against Pakistan.
This Indo-US deal has the potential to undermine the Pakistan’s strategy of minimum credible deterrence. Hence this cooperation can have disastrous effects on the stability of the region by tilting the strategic balance between in favor of India. Pakistan should convey to the US at the highest level, its security concerns caused by the latest Indo-US defence deal. We must emphasize upon the destabilizing consequences for South Asia caused by the open ended supply of highly advanced weapons to India, creating conventional asymmetry in the region.
Pakistan being the smaller state with a fragile economy cannot afford to indulge in an all-out arms race. However, Pakistan also should not remain oblivious to growing Indo-US cooperation as it can have strong security implications. Enhanced capacity building of Indian armed forces can threaten the deterrent value of Pakistan’s nuclear and conventional weapons. Hence a combination of expedient foreign policy along with credible conventional and nuclear deterrent could meet the desired national interest. In order to counter the conventional imbalance Pakistan has to rely on the indigenous weapon production, superior strategy and training.
Pakistan needs to build anti-weapons and long-range air defense system to detect any aerial threats and reduce the pace of the Indian mechanized forces. Moreover with these capabilities Pakistan can tackle with any advantage of Indian military in the conventional domain. Pakistan should build stronger ties with China while remaining strategically relevant to the US. Pakistan must revive its economy in order to counter the negative impact of the Indo-US strategic convergence.
It cannot be reiterated enough that the Indo-US defence deal raises strong security implication for Pakistan as it further increases the conventional asymmetry between the two states which will ultimately threaten the strategic stability of South Asia.Hence Pakistan needs to improve its overall conventional capabilities in order to fill the gaps and maintain the conventional balance. (Source:defencenews.in)


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

India-US Defence Deal 2020: Security Implications for Pakistan.

Friday, 28 February 2020

India, US decide to elevate ties, be global strategic partners - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

India, US decide to elevate ties, be global strategic partners.

Trump, who held bilateral talks with Modi at Hyderabad House in New Delhi, announced a defence deal of more than USD 3 billion under which India will buy US military equipment including MH-60R naval and AH-64E Apache helicopters.

US President Donald Trump, on his first State visit to India, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi decided Tuesday to elevate ties between their countries to a “comprehensive global strategic partnership”, giving it broader scope and scale.
ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-India-US-strategic-ties
Trump, who held bilateral talks with Modi at Hyderabad House in New Delhi, announced a defence deal of more than USD 3 billion under which India will buy US military equipment including MH-60R naval and AH-64E Apache helicopters.
While no trade deal was signed, Modi said Trump and he had agreed to initiate negotiations for a bigger deal. Trump, on his part, said they have made “tremendous progress” on a comprehensive trade agreement and he is optimistic they will reach a deal.
According to the joint statement issued late Tuesday, the two leaders said they looked forward to “early conclusion” of defence cooperation enabling agreements including Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement (BECA) and “expressed interest in the concept of the Blue Dot Network, a multi-stakeholder initiative that will bring governments, the private sector, and civil society together to promote high-quality trusted standards for global infrastructure development”.
They added the Haqqani network and Tehrik-e-Taliban in Pakistan (TTP) to the list of terror groups against whom they “called for concerted action”. Denouncing “any use of terrorist proxies” and strongly condemning cross-border terrorism in all its forms, they called on Pakistan to “ensure that no territory under its control is used to launch terrorist attacks, and to expeditiously bring to justice the perpetrators of such attacks, including 26/11 Mumbai and Pathankot”.
The US reaffirmed support for India’s entry into the Nuclear Suppliers Group “without any delay”, and the two sides supported “an Afghan-led and Afghan-owned peace and reconciliation process that results in a sustainable peace; cessation of violence; elimination of terrorist safe havens; and preservation of the gains of the last 18 years”. (Source: The Indian Express)


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

India, US decide to elevate ties, be global strategic partners

Wednesday, 26 February 2020

US becomes India’s top trading partner - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

US becomes India’s top trading partner.

America is one of the few countries with which India has a trade surplus. While dealing with the US, India had a surplus of 16.85 billion in the year 2018-19 alone.

The United States has become India’s top trading partner surpassing China, according to 2018-19 data from the Commerce Ministry. The bilateral trade between the US and India amounted to USD 87.95 billion as compared to USD 87.07 billion with China.
ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-US-India-trading-partner
Trade experts say a free trade agreement between the two nations would take their economic ties to a whole new level. According to an American business advocacy group, an FTA would exponentially help in resolving their trade disputes, PTI reported.
America is one of the few countries with which India has a trade surplus. While dealing with the US, India had a surplus of 16.85 billion in the year 2018-19 alone.
In the backdrop of a global economic slowdown, US President Donald Trump is set to visit India on February 24 and 25. Although a trade deal is not on the table, Trump has emphasised on ‘talking trade’ during his visit.
“Well, we can have a trade deal with India, but I’m really saving the big deal for later on, ” he told reporters in Washington. “We’re not treated very well by India” he added.
On his maiden visit to India president Trump and prime minister Modi are likely to focus on areas of counter-terrorism, defense, collaborations in mental health, healthcare to name a few. (Source: The indian express)


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

US becomes India’s top trading partner.

Sunday, 23 February 2020

Why India-US trade deal remains elusive - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

Why India-US trade deal remains elusive.

• India has increased buying crude oil and civilian aircraft from the US in recent times
• US fixation over tariffs, e-commerce curbs, data protection bill have put India in a spot
When the US on 4 March last year announced that it is withdrawing duty-free entry for Indian exports worth around $6 billion, it brought the curtains down to a year- long dialogue between the two strategic partners for hammering out a limited trade package.
In a hurriedly called press briefing early next day, India’s trade secretary Anup Wadhawan blamed the “disproportionate demands" by the US for collapse of the talks.
If both sides fail to close the limited trade deal during President Donald Trump’s two-day visit to India starting Monday as they have indicated, it would be third time unlucky as the deal was expected to be signed in September during Prime Minister Modi’s visit to the US to attend the United Nations General Assembly.
ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-India-US-elusive
India and the US, despite their robust diplomatic ties, have quibbled on trade over the years and across administrations. However, President Donald Trump who pursues an “America First" approach has been personally very vocal about the perceived high tariff walls that India has put and has often called out India terming it “tariff king". India denies the charge of being a high-tariff nation, holding that its tariff regime is fully compliant with its commitments under the World Trade Organisation rules.
To accommodate the US complain about the $18 billion trade surplus that it enjoys, India has increased buying crude oil and civilian aircraft from the US in recent times. US fixation over tariffs, India’s e-commerce restrictions and data protection bill have put India in a spot.
China factor
Any tariff cut by India to allow greater import of US goods needs to be done in a non-discriminatory manner for other countries as per WTO rules as both the countries are not negotiating a free trade agreement at present. For example, duty cut on high end mobile phones as demanded by the US side will benefit China as Apple manufactures most of its phones there. Indian commerce ministry in its 5 March statement last year raised the same fear. “On reduction of our IT duties, India's duties are moderate and not import stopping. Any MFN duty reduction would almost entirely benefit third countries," it added. With over $50 billion trade deficit with its Northern neighbor, India is obviously not keen to increase imports from China.
Similarly, if India cuts duty on high-powered fully built motorcycles to satisfy Trump’s fascination for selling more Harley Davidson bikes, it may actually benefit similar other brands such as Triumph (British), Yamaha (Japanese), and Dukati (German-Italian).
India’s trade conservatism
The long-stretched Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) negotiations which India exited at the last moment, seems to have fundamentally changed the thinking of the Modi government on its trade engagements. Not only does it now flex its muscles with smaller trade partners like Malaysia by putting restrictions on palm oil imports, it has increased tariffs on a host of products like toys and furnitures what it calls non-essential items. The open calls for import substitution and turn to Swadeshi have critics cry protectionism.
After the Budget FY21 put a health cess on import of medical devices amid talks between India and the US to find a way out of price caps put by India on stents and knee implants, Nisha Desai Biswal, president of the US India Business Council in an interview said she expects the US government to seek clarifications on the matter from the Indian side. “People are asking themselves why now and how this makes sense. I would imagine that it will be an issue of discussion between the two governments because finding a way forward on medical devices has been such an involved conversation between the two governments," she added.
Further signaling that India is in no mood to give a walk over on the proposed trade deal with the US, Goyal at an industry event on Thursday said: “I can assure you that just like in RCEP negotiations (where) India stood its ground, India’s decision on opening up our markets will rest on our imperatives for trade, not diplomacy. The same principle is going to be continued forward when we talk to any other country. India’s interests will be paramount," he added.
The future of the India-US trade relationship will depend on how patient and considerate US remains towards India’s development concerns and the flexibility that India can show within its self-imposed red lines. (Source: Livemint)


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

Why India-US trade deal remains elusive.

Sunday, 22 December 2019

Bill to promote Gandhi’s legacy introduced in US House - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

Bill to promote Gandhi’s legacy introduced in US House.

The bill seeks a budgetary allocation of USD 30 million every year for the next five years to the USAID for this foundation.

There are two other resolutions on Gandhi pending in the Congress -- one by Senators Bob Menendez and Ted Cruz in the Senate and other by several other lawmakers led by Congressman Raja Kishnamoorthi in the House of Representatives.
Sent to the House Foreign Affairs Committee for necessary action, the bill christened “Gandhi-King Scholarly Exchange Initiative Act’” says the people of the United States and India have a long history of friendship and the world will benefit from a stronger United States-India partnership.
ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-promote-Gandhi-legacy-US
Mahatma Gandhi never visited the US. But Martin Luther King travelled to India, which he described as a pilgrimage.
In February 1959, Dr King and his wife Coretta Scott King travelled throughout India.
By the end of his month-long visit, Dr King said, “I am more convinced than ever before that the method of non-violent resistance is the most potent weapon available to oppressed people in their struggle for justice and human dignity.”
Fifty years after Dr King’s visit, All India Radio discovered a taped message by Dr King that emphasised the intellectual harmony between messages of Dr King and Gandhi on non-violent social action.
“Mohandas Gandhi, who employed the principle of satyagraha or fighting with peace, has come to represent the moral force inspiring many civil and social rights movement around the world,” the bill says.


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

Bill to promote Gandhi’s legacy introduced in US House.

Sunday, 3 November 2019

India, US commit to increasing cooperation for money-laundering cases - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

India, US commit to increasing cooperation for money-laundering cases.

The two countries also re-affirmed their commitment to greater economic cooperation on global economic issues

India and the US on Friday committed to enhance cooperation in tackling money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism.
ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-India-US-laundering-money
In a joint statement issued after the seventh Meeting of the Economic and Financial Partnership (EFP), the two countries noted that their relationship has strengthened over time as both sides have developed a holistic approach on tackling money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT), which are the issues of shared concern.
The Indian delegation was led by Nirmala Sitharaman, Minister of Finance and the US side was led by Steven Mnuchin, the US Secretary of the Treasury.
"Our cooperation includes but is not limited to, information exchanges to combat global terrorist financing and to support the designation of specific terrorist facilitators and financiers, coordinating on AML/CFT and maintaining the integrity of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) global standards for AML/CFT," the statement said.
It further said India has demonstrated its support for action against non-compliant countries. In addition, India and the United States continue to work on developing AML/CFT frameworks to mitigate the associated illicit finance risks.
The two sides took note of the progress made in sharing financial account information between the two countries under the Inter-Governmental Agreement pursuant to the FATCA. Both sides will continue to collaborate and share experiences for tackling offshore tax evasion, it added.
During the meeting, India and the US discussed policies to stimulate economic growth and noted the significant steps New Delhi has taken to strengthen the financial sector, including public sector bank recapitalisation and plans to merge some of the state-owned banks.
Both sides also discussed capital flows, investment promotion related issues, and the external economic environment.
According to the statement, both sides took note of the importance of having greater attention to transparency and debt sustainability in bilateral development lending. India and the US both support global efforts to improve debt sustainability and transparency, including through the international financial institutions' multipronged approach and the efforts of the G20 and other groups.
The two countries also re-affirmed their commitment to greater economic cooperation on global economic issues, both bilaterally and multilaterally in the G20 and other fora.
"India and the United States look forward to enhanced collaboration to address the challenges to global growth under the G20 Presidency of Saudi Arabia. As India gears up for the 2022 Presidency of the G20, the United States stands ready to support India in hosting a successful and focused Presidency," the statement said.
It further said India and the US are working together to attract more private sector capital to finance India's infrastructure needs and further raise growth for both countries.
India has set up the National Infrastructure and Investment Fund (NIIF) to catalyze private institutional investment in Indian infrastructure, for which the United States has provided technical support.
The joint statement noted the two sides recognise the importance of foreign portfolio investors for supporting economic growth and discussed ways to build on India's positive steps in further opening to greater foreign portfolio investment. (Source: The Business Standard)


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

India, US commit to increasing cooperation for money-laundering cases.

Thursday, 11 April 2019

U.S. Infrared Satellite Data Could Settle The Debate Over Pakistan-India Dogfight - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

U.S. Infrared Satellite Data Could Settle The Debate Over Pakistan-India Dogfight.

America's constellation of panoptic infrared early warning satellites is known for providing the Pentagon with the first indication that a ballistic missile launch has occurred and where to cue the attention of other sensors so that the missile can be tracked, classified, and even potentially intercepted. Yet America's huge investment in orbital early warning platforms, which dates back to the 1960s, has also resulted in a secondary function for these systems—picking up much more than just large rocket and ballistic missile launches. These ancillary events can include the launch of smaller missiles, like surface-to-air and even air-to-air types, artillery barrages, large detonations on the ground... and exploding aircraft.

ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-US-Satellite-Infrared-India
The limited air battle between India and Pakistan that occurred over Kashmir on February 28, 2019, is one of the most hotly contested military events we have seen in a long time. Misinformation flowed like a waterfall in the hours, days, and weeks following the shoot-down of the Indian MiG-21 Bison by a Pakistani fighter, with allegations of systemic deception at the highest levels of government being flung with reckless abandon across both sides of Line Of Control. In fact, it continues to this very day with no sign of abating.
We have covered the story in extreme depth and tried to separate myth from reality and knowns from unknowns as much as possible in an attempt to bring an objective and well-versed viewpoint to the alarmingly murky and spiteful debate. But even a month and a half after the aerial engagement happened, what exactly occurred during it remains unclear.
India says their MiG-21 pilot that got shot down also shot down a fighter of his own—a Pakistani F-16—moments before his aircraft was struck. Meanwhile, Pakistan claims they lost no aircraft during the engagement and reports attributed to undisclosed sources state that all of its F-16s are accounted for.
So, when it comes to the air-to-air side of hostilities, we are left with one crucial question that has tensions boiling between the two long-time foes—was a Pakistani fighter shot down or not? India has produced some far from conclusive "radar data" that they say shows the F-16 being shot down. It also provides general positioning information of the aircraft involved and especially of the MiG-21 in relation to the F-16 that New Delhi says was shot down by its MiG pilot.
But with just a few screenshots to go by of said radar data and with Pakistan unwilling to provide any additional info of their own, the two sides seem locked in an informational stalemate of sorts, where one narrative is constantly pitted against the other without end.
The thing is that the Pentagon very likely possesses sensor data that can unequivocally prove one story right and the other wrong. That aforementioned infrared early warning constellation includes Space Based Infrared System (SBIRS) and Defense Support Program (DSP) satellites—the former being the more modern and advanced of the two. You can and should read all about these fascinating satellites and their origins in this past feature of mine.
It is all but certain that portions of America's space-based infrared early warning system staring down on the India-Pakistan area as the air battle unfolded. With the two countries possessing enough nuclear warheads to cause significant harm to the globe—many of which would be deployed via ballistic missile—the region is something of a "must monitor" for Department of Defense. This is especially true considering a nearly unprecedented bombing raid into Pakistani territory occurred just a day before the air engagement in question and a full-out war between the bitter foes could have been right around the corner.
As we mentioned earlier, these satellites not only have a strategic function, they also have a tactical one in that they have the ability to detect non-ballistic missile launches and other infrared events. In fact, there is an entire Air Force unit tasked with squeezing out secondary surveillance products from these spacecraft that constantly stare at the earther's surface. And they see a lot. In 2014, over 8,000 separate infrared events were detected and cataloged, the next year was even busier.
So, it is probable that any missile launches that occurred that day, whether it was an AIM-120 AMRAAM from the Pakistani F-16 or the R-73 from the Indian MiG-21, could have been detected, geolocated, and catalogized. But it is even less challenging for the satellites to detect a missile exploding in mid-air and causing the aircraft it showers with shrapnel to erupt into a massive fireball.
This is not conjecture. The downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 over Eastern Ukraine was picked up by SBIRS, as was the SA-11's missile launch that doomed that Boeing 777. The bombing of Metrojet Flight 9268 over the Sanai Peninsula was also detected by SBIRS. So, are we to believe that a fighter loaded with weapons and fuel, flying over what could be an imminent flashpoint of war between two nuclear powers, had a missile blow it out of the sky and it wasn't detected?
Highly unlikely, to say the least.
That data could totally validate or invalidate the radar surveillance data India has presented, including correlating the locations of the MiG and F-16 with the geolocations and timing of the infrared events detected.
So why isn't the U.S. setting the record straight assuming it has this information? Geopolitically there is a long list of reasons for the U.S. not to inject itself into a conflict between two nuclear-armed powers with different levels of complex relations with Washington D.C. In addition, the Pentagon has never been all that talkative about the secondary uses for its space-based infrared early warning network and detecting terrestrial infrared events is just one of its potentially secondary applications. Leveraging this information in real time could have huge advantages during a conflict, so it seems to only be talked about when it is absolutely necessary—like the shoot down of MH17, an event that Russia was accused of having a direct hand in.
So, there you have it. As the brutal information war on the internet rages on between the two estranged neighbors, keep in mind that the U.S. could most likely settle the debate once and for all with data it has had since the moment the engagement occurred. And this is just one intelligence product among many that the Pentagon and the U.S. intelligence community can pull from to make an accurate analysis of what went on that day. But as of yet, nobody with the power to do so is willing to offer up such definitive information to put the issue to rest.
It's possible that unless that changes, we may never truly know exactly what went on in the chaotic skies over Kashmir on that fateful day. (Source:defencenews.in)


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

U.S. Infrared Satellite Data Could Settle The Debate Over Pakistan-India Dogfight.

Monday, 1 April 2019

India, US Renew Triangular Development Cooperation In Asia And Africa - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

India, US Renew Triangular Development Cooperation In Asia And Africa.

The SGP agreement, signed in November 2014, underscores the contribution of the India-US partnership to global stability and prosperity.

India and the US Friday renewed a pact that provides a framework for promoting bilateral cooperation to meet the developmental aspirations of partner countries, particularly in Asia and Africa.
ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-India-US-Triangular-Asia-Africa
The First Amendment to the Statement of Guiding Principles (SGP) on Triangular Cooperation for Global Development was signed by Devyani Khobragade, Joint Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs of India, and Mark Anthony White, Mission Director for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) in India.
The SGP agreement, signed in November 2014, underscores the contribution of the India-US partnership to global stability and prosperity.
It provides a framework for promoting cooperation between the two countries to meet the developmental aspirations of partner countries, particularly in Asia and Africa.
The first amendment to the SGP agreement extends the validity of the SGP agreement up to 2021, a Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) statement said.
It expands the scope of capacity-building activities undertaken jointly by India and the US under this framework and also provides a consultative mechanism for joint biannual monitoring and review of activities undertaken under the SGP.
"Under the agreement, India and the US will continue to offer capacity-building assistance to partner countries in multiple sectors, focusing primarily on agriculture, regional connectivity, trade and investments, nutrition, health, clean and renewable energy, women empowerment, disaster preparedness, water, sanitation, education and institution building," the statement said.


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

India, US Renew Triangular Development Cooperation In Asia And Africa.

Friday, 15 March 2019

India, US Agree To Build 6 American Nuclear Power Plants In India - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

India, US Agree To Build 6 American Nuclear Power Plants In India.

The United States and India on Wednesday agreed to strengthen security and civil nuclear cooperation, including building six U.S. nuclear power plants in India, the two countries said in a joint statement.

The agreement came after two days of talks in Washington. The United States under President Donald Trump has been looking to sell more energy products to India, the world's third-biggest buyer of oil.
ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-India-US-American-Nuclear
The talks involved Indian Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale and Andrea Thompson, the US undersecretary of state for arms control and international security.
"They committed to strengthen bilateral security and civil nuclear cooperation, including the establishment of six U.S. nuclear power plants in India," the joint statement said.
It gave no further details of the nuclear plant project.
The two countries have been discussing the supply of US nuclear reactors to energy-hungry India for more than a decade, but a longstanding obstacle has been the need to bring Indian liability rules in-line with international norms, which require the costs of any accident to be channelled to the operator rather than the maker of a nuclear power station.
Pittsburgh-based Westinghouse has been negotiating to build reactors in India for years, but progress has been slow, partly because of India's nuclear liability legislation, and the project was thrown into doubt when Westinghouse filed for bankruptcy in 2017 after cost overruns on U.S. reactors.
Canada's Brookfield Asset Management bought Westinghouse from Toshiba in August 2018. Last April Westinghouse received strong support from US Energy Secretary Rick Perry for its India project, which envisaged the building of six AP1000 reactors in the state of Andhra Pradesh.
The agreement to build the reactors, announced in 2016, followed on from a US-India civil nuclear agreement signed in 2008.
India plans to triple its nuclear capacity by 2024 to wean Asia's third-largest economy off polluting fossil fuels.
Last October, India and Russia signed a pact to build six more nuclear reactors at a new site in India following summit talks between their leaders in New Delhi. (Source:defencenews.in)


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

India, US Agree To Build 6 American Nuclear Power Plants In India.

Tuesday, 12 February 2019

Why 2018 will be a landmark year for India-US strategic relationship - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

Why 2018 will be a landmark year for India-US strategic relationship.

India was among the few countries, which received a waiver on Iran sanctions from the Trump administration.

Notwithstanding irritants on trade issues, India and the US made “landmark" progress in 2018 to bolster their strategic and defence ties – from holding the maiden trilateral meeting with Japan to the first-ever 2+2 dialogue during which they signed the long-pending COMCASA agreement that would open the way for sales of more sensitive US military equipment to India.
ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-landmark-India-US-strategic
The trade disputes posed bumps on the road as President Donald Trump called India a “tariff king" in September. However, two months later, he praised Indians as tough negotiators as the two countries started talks on a bilateral trade deal.
India was among the few countries, which received a waiver on Iran sanctions from the Trump administration, which also pressed Pakistan to bring to justice the perpetrators of the 2008 Mumbai attack and announced a reward of USD 5 million for information leading to the arrest or conviction in any country of any individual who committed, conspired to commit, or aided the 26/11 attack.
“This has been a landmark year for US-India ties as we build out stronger relationships across the board," Alice Wells, the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia, told PTI.
“Last month, President Trump met in Buenos Aires with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in the first US-India-Japan – or ‘JAI’ meeting as Prime Minister Modi called it – between the three leaders, and Vice President (Mike) Pence reviewed the rapid development of the strategic partnership during his meeting with Prime Minister Modi in Singapore," said Wells, who has been Trump administration’s point person for the South and Central Asia.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo described the first 2+2 Ministerial Dialogue in September as “symbolic of our increasingly close partnership," she said.
Pompeo along with Defence Secretary James Mattis were hosted by their Indian counterparts, External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj and Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in New Delhi.
“The 2+2 focused on operationalising India’s status as a Major Defence Partner of the US, cooperation on global challenges, and our shared vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific," Wells said.
“The event culminated with the signing of the Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (COMCASA), which will facilitate greater interoperability between our forces, enhance information and intelligence sharing, and ensure that India has access to top-tier US military technology," she said.
“The finalisation of this agreement was a historic step and, since then, we have made significant strides toward finalising additional agreements that will enable our militaries and private sectors to work even closer together," she added.
India’s strategic partnership with the US and its emergence as a leading global power was on display during other high-level gatherings this year, including two meetings of the quadrilateral partners (Australia, India, Japan, and the US) and at the India-Japan-US trilateral meeting at the G-20 summit last month.
“At these meetings, US and Indian officials discussed our shared commitment to maintaining and strengthening a rules-based order in the Indo-Pacific based on respect and partnership, not domination," she said.
On the economic front, India-US trade relationship continues to grow, she said. Bilateral trade grew to USD 126 billion last year, and, parallel with the launch of the Strategic Energy Partnership, US-sourced oil and liquefied natural gas landed on Indian shores. “Still, we can do much more. US companies need better access to India’s markets in order for us to realise the full potential of our economic partnership," Wells said.
She said the Trump administration looks forward to building on this relationship’s momentum and working even more closely with the Indian counterparts on a range of shared strategic interests next year.
Nisha Desai Biswal, president of the US-India Business Council, believes 2018 experienced major upheavals impacting longstanding trade agreements and frameworks, with retaliatory tariffs, rising protectionism, and domestic political clashes spilling over into the economic policy of major economies.
“Despite these trade headwinds, the US-India commercial and strategic relationship continues to enjoy strong bipartisan support in the US, underpinned by rapidly expanding bilateral trade," she said.
On the US-India strategic front, proponents of greater interoperability scored some major wins, including the conferring of STA-1 status to India by Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross. “This puts India on par with America"s closest allies," she said.
Biswal said that on the commercial front, the private sector will be watching closely to see whether the two governments can reach a bilateral trade deal and resolve key trade irritants impacting US business.
“Business community engagement will be particularly critical in 2019, with a challenging political environment in both countries making protectionist policy a significant concern," she said.
The resumption of the US-India Commercial Dialogue next February, a US-India CEO Forum and the potential for a Trade Policy Forum will make 2019 a particularly important year, Biswal said.
All eyes are right now on the upcoming elections and how that will impact the economy and overall investment climate, she noted.
Alyssa Ayres from the Council of Foreign Relations said bilateral ties have made good progress on strategic and defence front, but economic ties are bumpier. (Source: Livemint)


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

Why 2018 will be a landmark year for India-US strategic relationship.

Wednesday, 6 February 2019

India among countries to benefit from US-China trade war: UN - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

India among countries to benefit from US-China trade war: UN.

• The US and China are locked in a trade war since President Donald Trump imposed heavy tariffs on imported steel and aluminium items in March last year
• The study also underlines the "common concern" that trade disputes have an unavoidable impact on the "still fragile" global economy
India is among a handful of countries that stand to benefit from the ongoing trade tensions between the world's top two economies - the US and China, the UN has said in its latest report.
ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-India-US-China-war
The US and China are locked in a trade war since President Donald Trump imposed heavy tariffs on imported steel and aluminium items in March last year, a move that sparked fears of a global trade war.
In response, China imposed tit-for-tat tariffs on billions of dollars worth of American imports.
The United Nations experts said Monday that the tit-for-tat trade dispute between China and the United States may do little to protect domestic producers in either country and could have "massive" implications on the global economy unless it is resolved.
Of the USD 250 billion in Chinese exports that are subject to US tariffs, only about six per cent will be picked up by firms in the US, according to a report by the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
And of the approximately USD 85 billion in US exports that are subject to China's tariffs, only about five per cent of this will be taken up by Chinese firms, according to the UN research.
In a bid to meet the US' demand of bringing down the USD 375 billion bilateral trade deficit, China has pledged to take measures to step-up American imports and investments. March 1, 2019 is the deadline for implementing the measures.
Unless the US and China agree to drop their tariff dispute by March 1, duty on each country's products will rise to 25 per cent, up from the current 10 per cent level, the UN said.
Countries that are expected to benefit the most from the trade war are the EU members as exports in the bloc are likely to grow by USD 70 billion. Japan and Canada will see exports increase by more than USD 20 billion each, it said.
Other countries set to benefit from the trade tensions include Australia, with 4.6 per cent export gains, Brazil (3.8) India (3.5), Philippines (3.2) and Vietnam (5), the study said.
Quoting former US Secretary of State Cordell Hull, UNCTAD's Pamela Coke-Hamilton repeated his description of protective tariffs as "a gun that recoils on ourselves", which had also contributed to the Great Depression of the 1930s and the rise of extremism.
"I think that is a single lesson from what we have had here today. If - barring an agreement between the US, China on March 1 - tariffs will escalate to 25 per cent, which is a significant difference from the 10 per cent as it currently exists," Coke-Hamilton said.
The implications of such a development would be "massive", the UNCTAD Director, Division on International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities, continued, adding that its effects would first of all involve "an economic downturn... due to instability in commodities and financial markets".
The UNCTAD study also warns that the spat could hit East Asian producers the hardest, with a projected USD 160 billion contraction in the region's exports unless discussions between China and the US are resolved before the March 1 deadline.
The study also underlines the "common concern" that trade disputes have an unavoidable impact on the "still fragile" global economy, particularly on developing, commodity-rich countries that are dependent on exports.
"One major concern is the risk that trade tensions could spiral into currency wars, making dollar-denominated debt more difficult to service," the report added.
Imposing tariffs make US-made products cheaper than imported ones, and encourage consumers to buy American. (Source:Livemint)


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

India among countries to benefit from US-China trade war: UN.

Tuesday, 5 February 2019

Russia suspends nuclear arms treaty after US says to pull out - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

Russia suspends nuclear arms treaty after US says to pull out.

• US said it will withdraw from INF treaty in six months unless Moscow ends violations of 1987 pact
• 'US has declared that they suspend their participation in the deal, we suspend it as well,' Putin said
Russia has suspended the Cold War-era Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, President Vladimir Putin said on Saturday, after the United States announced it would withdraw from the arms control pact, accusing Moscow of violations.
Moscow's relations with the West are strained over issues including Russia's annexation of Crimea from Ukraine, allegations of meddling in the US presidential election and being behind a nerve agent attack in Britain.
ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-Russia-nuclear-US-pull
The United States announced on Friday it will withdraw from the INF treaty in six months unless Moscow ends what it says are violations of the 1987 pact.
It would reconsider its withdrawal if Russia came into compliance with the agreement, which bans both nations from stationing short- and intermediate-range land-based missiles in Europe. Russia denies violating the treaty.
On Saturday, Washington said it had formally notified Russia and other treaty parties of the United States' intent and suspended its obligations under the INF.
"The American partners have declared that they suspend their participation in the deal, we suspend it as well," Putin said during a televised meeting with foreign and defence ministers.
Putin said Russia will start work on creating new missiles, including hypersonic ones, and told ministers not to initiate disarmament talks with Washington, accusing the United States of being slow to respond to such moves.
"We have repeatedly, during a number of years, and constantly raised a question about substantiative talks on the disarmament issue," Putin said. "We see that in the past few years the partners have not supported our initiatives."
The row over the treaty has drawn a strong reaction from Europe and China.
European nations fear the treaty's collapse could lead to a new arms race with possibly a new generation of US nuclear missiles stationed on the continent.
China urged the United States on Saturday to resolve its differences with Russia through dialogue.
During the meeting with Putin, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov accused the United States of violating the INF and other arms deals, including the non-proliferation treaty.
Putin said Russia would not deploy its weapons in Europe and other regions unless the United States did so.
The U.S. State Department said in a statement on Saturday that the United States could not be restricted by the treaty while Russia violated it.
"The United States has concluded that extraordinary events related to the subject matter of the Treaty arising from Russia's continued noncompliance have jeopardized the United States' supreme interests," the statement said.


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

Russia suspends nuclear arms treaty after US says to pull out.

Wednesday, 2 January 2019

US and Israel exit Unesco, claiming bias - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.US and Israel exit Unesco, claiming bias - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

US and Israel exit Unesco, claiming bias.

The withdrawal is mainly procedural yet serves a new blow to UNESCO, co-founded by the U.S. after World War II to foster peace.

The United States and Israel officially quit the U.N.’s educational, scientific and cultural agency at the stroke of midnight, the culmination of a process triggered more than a year ago amid concerns that the organization fosters anti-Israel bias.
ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-US-Israel-Unesco
The withdrawal is mainly procedural yet serves a new blow to UNESCO, co-founded by the U.S. after World War II to foster peace.
The Trump administration filed its notice to withdraw in October 2017 and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu followed suit.
The Paris-based organization has been denounced by its critics as a crucible for anti-Israel bias: blasted for criticizing Israel’s occupation of East Jerusalem, naming ancient Jewish sites as Palestinian heritage sites and granting full membership to Palestine in 2011.
The U.S. has demanded “fundamental reform” in the agency that is best known for its World Heritage program to protect cultural sites and traditions. UNESCO also works to improve education for girls, promote understanding of the Holocaust’s horrors, and to defend media freedom.
The withdrawals will not greatly impact UNESCO financially, since it has been dealing with a funding slash ever since 2011 when both Israel and the U.S. stopped paying dues after Palestine was voted in as a member state. Since then officials estimate that the U.S. — which accounted for around 22 percent of the total budget — has accrued $600 million in unpaid dues, which was one of the reasons for President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw. Israel owes an estimated $10 million.
UNESCO Director General Audrey Azoulay took up her post just after Trump announced the pullout. Azoulay, who has Jewish and Moroccan heritage, has presided over the launch of a Holocaust education website and the U.N.’s first educational guidelines on fighting anti-Semitism — initiatives that might be seen as responding to U.S. and Israeli concerns.
Officials say that many of the reasons the U.S. cited for withdrawal do not apply anymore, noting that since then, all 12 texts on the Middle East passed at UNESCO have been consensual among Israel and Arab member states.
In April of this year, Israel’s ambassador to UNESCO said the mood was “like a wedding” after member nations signed off on a rare compromise resolution on “Occupied Palestine,” and UNESCO diplomats hailed a possible breakthrough on longstanding Israeli-Arab tensions.
The document was still quite critical of Israel, however, and the efforts weren’t enough to encourage the U.S. and Israel to reconsider their decision to quit.
In recent years, Israel has been infuriated by repeated resolutions that ignore and diminish its historical connection to the Holy Land and that have named ancient Jewish sites as Palestinian heritage sites.
The State Department couldn’t comment because of the U.S. government shutdown. Earlier, the department told UNESCO officials the U.S. intends to stay engaged at UNESCO as a non-member “observer state” on “non-politicized” issues, including the protection of World Heritage sites, advocating for press freedoms and promoting scientific collaboration and education.
The U.S. could potentially seek that status during UNESCO Executive Board meetings in April.
The United States has pulled out of UNESCO before. The Reagan administration did so in 1984 because it viewed the agency as mismanaged, corrupt and used to advance Soviet interests. The U.S. rejoined in 2003.(Source: Livemint)


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

US and Israel exit Unesco, claiming bias.

Monday, 26 November 2018

India to bypass US Dollars, will make payment in rupees for Russian Air Defence System - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

India to bypass US Dollars, will make payment in rupees for Russian Air Defence System.

India is planning to pay in rupees for Very-Short-Range Air Defence (VSHORAD) systems from Russia; the deal is likely to be concluded next year, a government official told Sputnik.
ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-india-to-bypass-US-dollars
The decision to pay the rupee equivalent of around US $1.5 billion for the defence systems was made to circumvent US sanctions against Russia which were launched under the Countering America's Adversaries through Sanctions Act (CAATSA).
However, the two countries are hopeful that some other arrangement will also be available by the time the first instalment of the contract money would be made.
Sources confirmed with Sputnik that the procurement of the Very-Short-Range Air Defence system was discussed during the 19th annual summit, held on October 5 in New Delhi.
On Monday, Russia's Rosoboronexport was declared the winner of the restricted tender, which was floated in 2010 for the procurement of 5,185 missiles and associated equipment under the Indian Army's VSHORAD program.
MBDA of France and Saab of Sweden were also in the competition, but the Russian state company quoted the lowest price.
Sources told Sputnik that half of the acquisition will be supplied in ready-to-use form, while another 2,260 missiles will be supplied in complete or semi-knocked-down condition. Around 1,276 single and multi-launchers will be manufactured at India's state-owned defence unit as part of a technology transfer arrangement. Eventually, as many as 15,000 units may be procured at a later stage.
The IGLA-S (SA-24) Very-Short-Range Air Defence unit is Russia's latest MANPADS weapon; it was offered to the Indian Army and ensures better performance than SA-18 missiles. The IGLA-S system is designed for use against visible targets as tactical aircraft, helicopters, unmanned aerial vehicles, cruise missiles, head-on or receding, and can be used despite the presence of natural (background) clutter and countermeasures.(source:defencenews.in)


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

India to bypass US Dollars, will make payment in rupees for Russian Air Defence System.

Friday, 2 November 2018

US agrees to grant India waiver from Iran sanctions - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

US agrees to grant India waiver from Iran sanctions.

The US has broadly agreed to grant India a waiver from Iran sanctions, which would allow Indian oil companies to continue to import about 1.25 million tonnes of oil a month till March from Tehran, sources familiar with the matter said, adding that an official announcement could come over the next few days.

ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-US-India-waiver
The US plans to re-impose oil-related sanctions on Iran on November 4 to choke the Islamic Republic’s biggest source of income and pressure it to renegotiate a new nuclear deal. Any country, or company, trading with Iran without US consent after sanctions kick off risks getting cut off from the American financial system.
The US has insisted all along that it wanted everyone to reduce oil imports from Iran to zero eventually, but was open to country-specific waivers that would allow limited imports by those pledging ‘significant’ cut. India and other key importing countries have been engaged for months with the US for a waiver.
“India and the US have broadly agreed on a waiver. India will cut import by a third, which is a significant cut,” a source said.
India had imported about 22 million tonnes of crude oil from Iran in 2017-18 and planned to raise that to about 30 million tonnes in 2018-19. But, as a condition of waiver, Indian oil firms will reduce their imports significantly, the source said. Indian companies can import 1.25 million tonnes a month up to March 2019, the same as they ordered for October and November, the source said. State oil firms are yet to decide on how this quantum will be split between them. A waiver will come as a big relief to Indian Oil and MRPL, the two largest Iranian oil consumers.
How companies will pay for Iranian oil is still being negotiated between India and Iran, sources said, adding that it’s likely that the two countries will stick to the existing mechanism under which 55% of payment is made in euro and 45% in rupee through UCO BankNSE -1.83 %. Under this, rupee is used for import of rice, drugs, and other products from India while the balance proceeds in rupee and euro sit idle in the Indian bankNSE -0.81 % waiting for sanctions to go.
The Indian side, while building its case for a waiver, assured the US that this payment mechanism ensures Iran can’t use oil money from India for any terror-related activity, a key American concern. During the negotiations, India also told the US that it would like to import more American oil if it came on competitive terms, sources said.
India and Iran still have to figure out shipping and insurance details for a smooth trade. Currently, Iran provides its tankers as well as insurance for oil cargoes to India. The US sanctions have driven away Indian and international shippers and insurers from extending their services for Iranian oil imports.
Refineries using Iranian oil have also faced insurance issues during renewals in recent months.
Indian and the US officials have been negotiating for months on terms of waiver from sanctions. India prefers Iranian oil as it comes cheap and suits many refineries' technical configuration. (Source:pib)


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

US agrees to grant India waiver from Iran sanctions.

Tuesday, 23 October 2018

US to pull out of Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces treaty with Russia - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis

US to pull out of Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces treaty with Russia

Trump accuses Moscow of violating Cold War-era INF treaty by deploying Novator missile

ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-intermediate-range-nuclear-forces-treaty
U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed that the U.S. would pull out of the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty with Russia, a crucial Cold War-era treaty banning the development, testing and possession of short and medium range ground-launched nuclear missiles with a range of 500-5,000 km. The treaty, signed in 1987, was central to ending the arms race between the two superpowers, and protected America’s NATO allies in Europe from Soviet missile attacks.
John Bolton, Mr Trump’s National Security Advisor, is in Moscow on a visit and is expected to convey the decision to the Russians. At issue is Russia’s alleged development and deployment of the Novator 9M729 missile, also known as the SSC-8, that could strike Europe at short notice, an allegation that Russia has repeatedly denied. “Russia has violated the agreement. They’ve been violating it for many years... so we’re going to terminate the agreement. We’re going to pull out,” Mr. Trump told reporters.
Accusations of Russia violating the treaty pre-date the Trump presidency, and go back to 2008. “I don’t know why President Obama didn’t negotiate or pull out. And we’re not going to let them violate a nuclear agreement and go out and do weapons and we’re not allowed to,” said Mr. Trump.
The U.S. administration, under former President Barack Obama, raised the issue of Russia testing a ground-launched cruise missile with Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2014. The Russians denied the allegations and raised counter-allegations of the U.S. installing missile defence systems in Europe.
While the two countries failed to find a resolution using the dispute resolution mechanism in the treaty, the U.S. continued to remain party to the treaty under pressure from its European allies. Mr. Bolton, known to be a hawk, has been the driving force behind the U.S.’s decision to withdraw from the INF, The New York Times had reported on Friday, prior to Mr. Trump announcing the withdrawal. U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis had told NATO Ministers earlier in October that the U.S. would withdraw from the INF if Russia did not roll-back its Novator missiles
A withdrawal will allow the U.S. new weapon options in the Pacific in its efforts to counter China’s growing influence. There are also concerns that the treaty’s end could mark the beginning of a new arms race between the U.S. and Russia.
Russia’s warning:
The Russian government on Sunday warned the U.S. against such a withdrawal. “If the Americans continue to act as crudely and bluntly... and unilaterally withdraw from all sorts of agreement and mechanisms from the Iran deal to the International Postal treaty, then we’ll be reduced to taking action in response, including of a military nature. But we don’t want to go that far,” said Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov.
Reactions across Europe were varied. The German Foreign Minister, Heiko Maas, called Mr Trump’s decision “regrettable” and the U.K. Defence Secretary, Gavin Williamson, said Britain would remain “absolutely resolute” in standing by the U.S. in its position against Russia.(Source: The Hindu)

The above article can also be read using the link below:

US to pull out of Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces treaty with Russia

Friday, 12 October 2018

‘Not helpful’, says US on India’s plans to buy Iran oil, Russia’s S-400 air missiles - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

‘Not helpful’, says US on India’s plans to buy Iran oil, Russia’s S-400 air missiles.

State department spokesperson Heather Nauert said “it’s not helpful” to note India plans to continue buying Iranian oil and the decision to purchase Russian S-400 air defence systems, both of which are subject to secondary American sanctions.

ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-US-India-Iran-Russia
As a top US official headed to New Delhi for talks on Iran sanctions, a state department spokesperson said “it’s not helpful” to note India plans to continue buying Iranian oil and Russian S-400 air defense systems, both subject to secondary sanctions under separate legislations.
The spokesperson’s observation on Thursday came a day after President Donald Trump told reporters that India would find out “sooner think you think” about his decision on whether to impose sanctions on a $5.4-billion S-400 deal with Russia. He also said the US would “take care of” of reported plans by India and China to continue buying Iranian crude after sanctions kick in on November 5.
State department spokesperson Heather Nauert added a new edge to Trump’s comments when she said that “when we hear about things such as purchasing oil or purchasing of the S-400 systems, it’s not helpful”.
“The US government just reviews that very carefully,” she added.
The state department announced on Thursday that the special representative on Iran, Brian Hook, accompanied by assistant secretary of state for energy Francis Fannon, will meet “Indian government counterparts for consultations”.
The statement didn’t provide details of talking points, but added Hook “will engage our allies and partners on our shared need to counter the entirety of the Iranian regime’s destructive behavior in the Middle East, and in their own neighbourhoods”.
From New Delhi Hook will carry on to Luxembourg, France and Belgium.
India signed an agreement with Russia last week for five S-400 systems despite appeals from the US that the air defence systems are a “focus area” of secondary sanctions under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), which is aimed at punishing Russia for annexing Crimea and interfering in the 2016 US elections.
The Indian government has indicated state-owned refiners will continue buying Iranian crude after the second round of US sanctions kick in on November 5, specifically targeting oil, ports and banking. New Delhi had cut its purchases in anticipation of the curbs.
India has sought waivers, which the US has said it may consider on a case-by-case basis for countries that show a significant reduction in imports. But India has received no guarantees publicly yet. New Delhi also wants a carve-out for Chabahar, an Iranian port it has helped develop as a gateway to Afghanistan and Central Asia.
Iran is among India’s three largest oil suppliers and New Delhi will need time to look for and switch to other providers, a process in which the US has said it is helping out. A phased reduction in oil imports has been sought, as was the policy under president Barack Obama before the signing of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in 2015 that lifted UN-mandated Iran sanctions reinforced by those imposed by the US.


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

‘Not helpful’, says US on India’s plans to buy Iran oil, Russia’s S-400 air missiles.

Wednesday, 19 September 2018

India, US closing in on package deal to remove trade irritants - Pragnya IAS Academy - News Analysis.

India, US closing in on package deal to remove trade irritants.

The current discussions are focussed on removing outstanding sources of friction, and are not aimed at creating a bilateral free trade agreement between the two nations.

ias-coaching-centres-bangalore-hyderabad-pragnya-ias-academy-current-affairs-India-US-irritants
Indian farmers and US manufacturers of medical devices could be among the main winners in a trade package under negotiation, as Washington and New Delhi look to remove long-standing irritants to ties, sources familiar with the talks said.
Having skirmished for months over tit-for-tat tariffs on steel and some agricultural products, the two sides began talks in June that also cover India’s concerns over US steel tariffs and US problems with Indian tariffs on imported IT equipment.
“We are closely negotiating a discrete package of trade issues. It will amount to a pretty substantive agreement,” said a source with knowledge of the negotiations.
Neither the office of the United States Trade Representative or India’s trade ministry responded to a request for comment.
The source said the two sides expected to close the deal in the next few weeks.
US President Donald Trump, who dislikes multilateral trade agreements, said earlier this month that India had approached the United States to “start doing a trade deal,” without giving any details.
The current discussions, however, are focussed on removing outstanding sources of friction, and are not aimed at creating a bilateral free trade agreement, sources from both sides said.
Having already waded into bigger fights with China and the European Union, Trump has previously called out India for unfair trade practices. At an estimated $126 billion, US goods and services trade with India last year was less than a fifth of its trade with China.
Unlike some other countries India failed to be given a waiver after the Trump administration imposed new import tariffs on steel and aluminium imports in March.
New Delhi retaliated by raising tariffs on a number of US products but has held back from implementing them while it negotiates a package to soothe ties. The tariffs were to go into effect from Monday midnight but the government issued an order saying these had been deferred until November 2.
“Our relationship with the US unlike many other nations has not deteriorated,” said an Indian government official involved in the talks. “But if you think relations have become very friendly with a lot of bonhomie, I don’t think that has happened either.”
Capping margins, not prices
US companies are hungrily watching an Indian economy that is growing at more than 8%, as they seek presence in a market that has potential for massive growth.
One of the most prominent trade issues to erupt during Trump’s presidency has involved India’s treatment of medical devices imported from the United States. Last year, US exports of medical devices and equipment to India totalled $863 million.
India last year equated high profit margins of medical device makers with “illegal profiteering”, capping prices for some heart stents - small wire-mesh structures used to treat blocked arteries - and knee implants, to help poor patients.
That measure provoked a storm of criticism from US companies, such as Abbott Laboratories, Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and Boston Scientific, which said such controls hurt innovation and future investment plans.
In June, India’s federal think tank Niti Aayog invited industry views on a new policy which would cap trade margins, and not prices, to help patients while allowing the industry “reasonable profits”.
Two Indian government sources said the think tank had recommended allowing a maximum 65% trade margin—the difference between the price at which a company sells to its stockists, after recovering its operational expenses, and the price paid by patients.
The recommendation has still to be accepted by Modi’s office, another source said.
The new policy proposal, which is favoured by both J&J and Boston Scientific according to company letters seen by Reuters, would help manufacturers who have argued that outright price caps were at times below their import costs and led to losses.
Modi’s office did not respond to a request for comment.
Breakthrough in farm products
One of the main areas where India is likely to benefit will be agricultural trade, with Washington expected to grant concessions making it easier for Indian exporters of products like rice, mangoes, table grapes and lychees the sources said.
Currently, the United States imports just a small fraction of the $5.5 billion of rice shipped annually from India, the world’s top rice exporter. New Delhi wants to sell basmati rice but US agencies have in the past flagged concerns over the presence of chemical residues in the rice.
New Delhi is also discussing how to meet stringent US standards to sell bovine meat. India is the world’s biggest buffalo meat exporter but has failed to make much headway in the US market because of Washington’s insistence that a country be free from foot-and-mouth disease.
The two sides are exploring ways to open the US market for certain grades of bovine meat from India, according to the Indian government negotiator and the other sources familiar with the talks.
For its part, the United States wants to sell more almonds to India, the world’s top buyer, cherries and eventually dairy products.
The United States has also been urging India to lower the input costs of components for IT that would allow US companies to manufacture in India as part of Modi’s flagship Make-in-India campaign. These affect firms such as Apple Inc. and Qualcomm Inc. with plans to set up operations in India.
The United States has complained that India’s tariffs are among the highest in the world, and cover a range of IT equipment, including circuit boards, screens and memory chips.
“In this kind of a package, everything is interlinked even though our mutual concerns are on different issues,” one of the sources said.
“But we need to reach an agreement on everything that’s on the table.” (Source: Livemint)


The above Article can also be read using the link below:

India, US closing in on package deal to remove trade irritants.