Govt aims to remove poverty by 2032

Transforming India, an ambitious action plan finalised after two months of brainstorming shepherded by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has recommended a slew of reforms to be implemented by ministries and departments if India has to grow by 10 per cent per annum until 2032. This, according to the action plan, will totally eradicate poverty from India in the next 16 years and also create 175 million new jobs.

"Growing at 10 per cent will transform India - India will be a $10 trillion economy with no poverty in 2032," the plan states. In 2015-16, the size of the Indian economy was a little over $2 trillion and the gross domestic product growth was around 7.6 per cent. As part of first steps in this grand plan, the government has set out to implement WTO-compatible procurement norms by 2017-18, achieve 100 per cent rural electrification by May 2018, increase rural teledensity to 100 per by 2020, reach broadband connectivity through optical fibre to all gram panchayats by December 2018 and have 175 million broadband connections by 2017.

The 23-page action plan also envisages reforms in the agriculture and allied sectors, including deregulation of genetically engineered (Bt) insect-resistant pulses by 2017-18, creation of buffer stock for pulses by 2017-18 and target 15 million metric tonnes of fish production by 2020. It also plans to implement seeding of Aadhaar number in 90 per cent of ration cards by the end of FY17. PAN (Permanent Account Number) is to be made mandatory for all businesses and entities and serve as unique business identifier also by the end of FY17.

The PM identified eight themes and decided to constitute eight groups of secretaries to come out with recommendations and a road map for each of the themes. The objective of the action plan was to foster development but with inclusive growth and efficiency..

The eight themes identified by the PM were - accelerated growth with inclusion and equity; employment generation strategies; universal access to quality health and education; good governance; farmer-centric Issues in agriculture and allied sectors; Swachh Bharat and Ganga Rejuvenation; energy conservation and efficiency and innovative budgeting and effective implementation.

The government plans to have proactive consultations with the states as they "have an important role in implementation of a number of these initiatives on pan-India basis."

Significance of Maharashtra Protection of People from Social Boycott (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act of 2016

Caste prejudices and social stigma associated with caste still persist in our society and the Maharashtra Protection of People from Social Boycott (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act of 2016is another law which seeks to curb these age old Inhuman practices.

Significance:

Law enforcement:
1. The act provides for the speedy trial within the 6 months of chargesheet filed.
2. Provision for punishment to the Individual and caste panchayats for perpetuating the caste discrimination and social boycott.

Social:
1. Deterrent to caste prejudices
2. Easy access to available resources like education,healthcare,rivers,ponds wells,forests and other common goods
3. Would counter the Inferiority and superiority complex complex entrenched in society.

Economical:
1. Equal opportunities in jobs and government employment schemes.
2. A boon for Dalit capitalism

Political:
1. Augment the political representation.
2. Strengthen the voice of "Untouchables" in formation of new legislations.

Constitutional:
1. Uphold the principles of Right to equality under article 14-18 and Right to Life under article 21
2. In lines with theSocialist and gandhian directive principles.

Ethical:
1. In lines with the Human ethics of OECD and UN documents.
2. would act as moral force and torch bearer for other states to enact such law.

However, the Litmus test of the law would be the enforcement of the provisions of this law in true letter and spirit given the poor state of policing. The recent concern of CJI related to the lack ofJudicial workforce holds the testimony to the fact that such laws would be ineffective without the a proper Judicial Impact assessment